When a certain bad event has developed to the point of no return, obtaining benefits from it becomes one of the options, and in this respect, Damei is obviously professional. Even more professional than Dou Dou.
After all, allies are traditionally there to be sucked dry, and this comes with a natural sense of justice. After all, they really did spend money to ensure their allies' safety. As everyone knows, the service industry is the most developed in the United States.
Having already provided services, it's only reasonable and professional to charge a service fee every now and then, which is even highly educational for Dou Dou.
The results are naturally very good.
It also proves once again that group will can be easily influenced by mainstream media's opinion, and so-called independent thinking often crumbles when faced with full-throttle thought manipulation.
Without independent and credible sources of information, the more independent thinking one engages in, the more laughable the conclusions often are.
Very few can arrive at correct conclusions from partial or even completely erroneous information.
For example, this world's struggle for resources has reached an intense level, yet there are always people who choose to ignore it.
But when the United States also joins the feast, the pressure finally rolls over, like a snowball, to the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.
An organization may not feel much.
But every individual within the organization can feel the suffocation.
Everyone dislikes the United States and sympathizes with the Science Academy, but at this time, very few are willing to stand up and call for justice.
As once said by a famous Nobel Prize laureate in public: "Although emotionally I am inclined towards them (Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences), they are clearly wrong this time. I can't imagine that a world-class award committee would so simply and straightforwardly bow down to a director Langley who has just taken office.
This is a disgrace to the academic community, and it fills us with too many doubts about the entire judging process. We used to entrust all hopes of fairness in the awards to the professionalism and impartiality of the jury, but that idea is too utopian. And what would I do if I faced such a threat?
Quite simple, I would expose it. Since Sir Andre had the courage to sacrifice himself for the century-old reputation of the Science Academy, I don't understand what kind of pressure at the time prevented him from disclosing the threats he faced in the public media. I don't even know whether such pressure came from inside or outside. In any case, this scandal should never have developed to this extent!"
When this voice spread around the world in a very short time, all explanations and rebuttals seemed pale and weak.
The emotions of many students were once again stirred up and even started to boil.
Because the professor was right!
Shouldn't the first reaction to such an unjust threat be to expose it directly?!
Once exposed, wouldn't the united strength of everyone be enough to force the overreaching local director trying to meddle with a world-class award to step down?
Indeed, the fact proved that after the incident was exposed, the director couldn't withstand the pressure and chose to resign from his office, didn't it?
For these new generations of scientific researchers, they truly hope the world has academic fairness.
The effect was also very apparent; all evaluators related to the Crawford Prize within the Science Academy, no matter what previous positions they held within the Academy, began to resign one after another. Some even voluntarily gave up their title of academician.
And with all this, the discussions about the evaluation rules for the Qiaoze Natural Science Award once again surged, unrestrainable.
Compared to the Nobel Prize's nomination system, where the outside world knows nothing about the discussion processes and results before the award committee selects the winners, the complete transparency of this award is just too fair!
Anyone just by logging onto the website can know all candidates' contribution scores, and everyone can check these candidates' research outcomes and progress at any time.
All the great scientists included on the candidate interface don't even dare to meddle because there is a public display period. Any fraudulent or other academic misconduct would be monitored at all times by everyone interested in the award around the world – this is the true academic light!
Not a few old men voting behind closed doors! And even the voting results could be influenced by a rookie director!
Didn't you see that many awards in the United States have already considered introducing artificial intelligence into the award selection process?
It is said that Open AI is already gearing up, planning to design related plugins to let ChatGPT provide technical Visit NovelHub for more amazing novels and chapters.
Perhaps, this is the real direction of the future.
The literary and art communities are also pushing the envelope. A satirical comic quickly became popular on social media.
The main part of the comic is the Nobel Prize judging scene, but instead of being solemn and serious, the scene appears ridiculously comical. The experts are short in stature, even jumping on the table, but behind them, there are countless tall silhouettes, silently watching everything, like numerous invisible hands manipulating the final result.
In a way, for everyone, watching this drama unfold over the internet was truly a gratifying feast.
Don't say academia is too far removed from ordinary people and that few pay attention.
That depends on how many media outlets devote how much effort to reporting it.
Not to mention that the Nobel Prize has a popular base even in Huaxia.